SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(Mad) 283

NATESAN
Krishnamurthi Aiyar – Appellant
Versus
Govindaswami Pillai – Respondent


Advocates:
K. Sarvabhauman and K. Gopalachari, for Petitioner; K.V. Venkataseshadri, for Respondent.

Judgement

ORDER :- This application under Art. 227 of the Constitution has been preferred questioning the legality and regularity of an order passed by the Election Court under the Madras Panchayats Act 1958, pending an Election petition under the Act at the instance of the first respondent herein. By the impugned proceeding, the Election Court has directed the petitioner herein to appear before the Medical Officer, Government Leprosy Subsidiary centre. Vridhachalam, and submit himself for medical examination, for the purpose of ascertaining the fact whether he was suffering from leprosy. The petitioner herein is the first respondent in the Election petition above referred to and the successful candidate as against the first respondent herein in the election held for one seat for the Srinushnam Town Panchayat, South Arcot Dt. The election of the petitioner is challenged inter alia on the ground that he was suffering from leprosy mid therefore, disqualified under Section 25(2)(a) of the Panchayat Act. Under the rules framed pursuant to the powers conferred under Section 178(2) of the Act, the District Munsif having territorial jurisdiction over the place in which the office of the Pa







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top