SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Mad) 347

NATESAN
Bagiammal – Appellant
Versus
Kamalammal – Respondent


Advocates:
S. Vaidyanathan, for Appellant; S. Varadarajulu Naidu and V. Srinivasan and R.D. Indrasenan, for Respondents.

Judgement

JUDGMENT :- The plaintiff is the appellant in the second appeal. The courts below have given diverse findings on the same question of fact. The suit was filed for partition and separate possession of the plaintiff's half share in the suit properties, which admittedly belonged to one Ramaswami alias Kannappan. The case of the plaintiff, who is the mother of the deceased Ramaswami, is that her son Ramaswami died intestate on 13-07-1956, leaving besides her, his widow - Kamalammal, the first defendant in the suit. The second defendant in the suit is an alienee of the suit properties from the widow. The plaintiffs right, it goes without saying, is based upon the provisions of Act 30 of 1956, which came into force on 17-06-1956, Along with the plaint, a death register extract was filed. In the written statement by the first defendant, while putting the plaintiff to proof that Ramaswami died on 13-07-1956, the first defendant also stated that he died in May 1956. In her evidence, the plaintiff stated that Ramaswami died in the month of Ani. The only other person, who is competent to speak about when Ramaswami died, the wife who is the first defendant in the case, has not gone in











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top