SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Mad) 219

S.NAINAR SUNDARAM
V. Mohamed Saliha – Appellant
Versus
The Management Of A. Abdul Shukoor And Co. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S. Nainar Sundaram, J.

1. This writ appeal directed against the order of the learned sing Judge in W.P. No. 4085 of 1980. That was as petition preferred by the first respondent questioning the Award of the second respondent I.D. No. 270 of 1978. By that Award, non-employment of the appellant by the (SIC) respondent was held to be not justified, and the was a direction for reinstatement of the appellant with continuity of service, back wages and other attendant benefits. It will be convenient if we refer to the parties as per their array in the writ petition. The first-respondent was in the employ of the petitioner as a van driver. The finding rendered by the second respondent in the industrial dispute is to the effect that the employment of the first respondent with the petitioner commenced on 29.5.1973. According to the first-respondent, his services were terminated without any reasonable cause in April, 1978. According to the petitioner, the first-respondent left the services on his own altar an accident in which the van driven by the first respondent was involved. The petitioner did not put forth a case be any disciplinary action and an order of dismissal following after






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top