SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Mad) 294

K.M.NATARAJAN
Yesodaiammal – Appellant
Versus
Mahalakshmi Ammal – Respondent


JUDGMENT

K.M. Natarajan, J.

1. This appeal is filed by the 2nd defendant in the suit challenging the judgment and decree passed by the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore in S.No. 179 of 1979.

2. The facts which are necessary for the disposal of this appeal can be briefly stated as follows: The 1st respondent in this appeal, who is the plaintiff in the suit, has filed the suit for recovery of a sum of Rs.15,653.75 on the basis of a mortgage deed dated 3-2-1965 executed by one Sankarappa Thevar and his son the 1st defendant herein, for a sum of Rs. 17,000 agreeing to pay interest at 12 per cent per annum. Subsequently, Sankarappa Thevar died and his son the 1st defendant alone is his legal representative. Since the 1st defendant has paid only a portion of the amount, the suit has been filed for the balance.

3. The suit is resisted by the 1st defendant on the ground that he is entitled to the benefit of Section 2 of Act 40 of 1979. The 1st defendant has also pleaded some oral discharge. The 2nd defendant, who is the appellant herein contended that she is a prior mortgagee of item 2 of the suit property and the 1st defendant had become subscriber of a chit for Rs. 11,000 condu










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top