SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Mad) 380

K.NATARAJAN, THANIKKACHALAM
M. Vaithilingam Pillai – Appellant
Versus
Minor Maruganandham – Respondent


JUDGMENT

K.M. Natarajan, J.

1. The unsuccessful defendant in O.S. No. 197 of 1981 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirappalli, has preferred this appeal challenging the decree and judgment passed in the said suit.

2. The case of the respondent-plaintiff is briefly as follows :-- The plaintiff's grand-father Marudaiya Pillai, who was a devotee of Sub-ramaniaswami wanted to perform a charity on auspicious days like Karthigai, including feeding poor. He constructed a building and named it after "Karthigai Annadhana Mandapam" next to his house at door No. 24, Thiruthanthoni Road, Woriyuur, Tiruchy and he was performing the said Kattalai. His ambition was that the Kattalai must be continuously performed without any break even after his lifetime. Hence, he created a permanent trust under the name and style of "Karthigai Kattalai attached to Annadhana Madam" and endowed properties set out in the schedule thereto. In the said madam, there is a portrait of Palani Dhandayudhapani for which he used to perform pooja on every Karthigai day of every Tamil month. Accordingly, he has created a permanent trust in the last Will and testament dated 12.7.82.

3. As per the recitals in the Will he


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top