SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Mad) 969

SRINIVASAN
A. P. S. Bahurudeen – Appellant
Versus
Antony – Respondent


ORDER

Srinivasan, J.

1. This is an application for permission to withdraw the suit out of which the second appeal has arisen with liberty to file a fresh suit on the same cause of action. The petitioners filed O.S. No. 392 of 1980 on the file of District Munsif, Manamadurai for declaration that the suit property is a wakf property and a consequential injunction restraining the respondents from in any way interfering with the peaceful possession of the plaintiffs. The suit has been filed in a representative capacity by the plaintiffs for themselves and as representatives of Muslim residents of the village of Rajagopuram, Sivaganga Taluk, Ramnad District. Defendants 1 and 2 were impleaded as representatives of the Christian community residents of the said village. The third defendant was the Tamil Nadu Wakf Board. The courts below negatived the claim of the petitioners and dismissed the suit. One of the grounds on which the suit has been dismissed is that the State Government is a necessary party and the non-joinder of the Government is fatal to the suit. On the merits also, the courts found the petitioners failed to establish their claim that the suit property is a wakf property in th




























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top