SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Mad) 927

ARUNACHALAM
Chandrasekar – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


ORDER

Arunachalam, J.

1. The petitioner was tried in C.C. No. 176 of 1983 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Dharmapuri for the following offences: (1) Section 304-A Indian Penal Code (two counts); (2) Section 337 Indian Penal Code and (3) Section 279 Indian Penal Code. The trial Court found the petitioner guilty as charged and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year under each count for the offence under Section 304-A, IPC and undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months of the offence under Section 337 I.P.C. No separate sentence was imposed for the offence under Section 279, I.P.C. The aggrieved petitioner preferred C.A. No. 106 of 1984 before the Court of Session, Dharampuri at Krishanagiri. The learned Appellate Judge concurring with the findings rendered by the trial magistrate dismissed the appeal.

2. In this revision, the petitioner challenges the correctness of the conviction recorded and the sentence imposed.

3. Mr., T. Munirathina Naidu, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner contended that there was no proof that the occurrence had taken place either due to rashness or negligence on the part of the petitioner. He contended that the







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top