SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Mad) 925

K.M.NATARAJAN
C. Arumughathan – Appellant
Versus
S. Muthusami Naidu – Respondent


JUDGMENT

K.M. Natarajan, J.

1. This appeal has been preferred by the ninth defendant in O.S. No. 223 of 1977 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Madurai, challenging the decree and judgment passed in the above suit for permanent injunction or in the alternative for recovery of possession.

2. The case of respondents 1 to 3 plaintiffs 2 to 4 as disclosed from the plaint can be briefly stated as follows:

The subject matter of this appeal is only in respect of item 42 of the plaint A Schedule properties, to an extent of 4.74 acres. According to the plaintiffs, the deceased first plaintiff and one Chinnama Naidu, who is the father of defendants 1 to 3, are brothers. The said Chinnama Naidu, who was the elder brother died on 1.1.1963 and they constituted a joint Hindu family. The properties described in A Schedule, including item 42, were comprised of the properties acquired by the deceased first plaintiff and the deceased Chinnama Naidu. The deceased first plaintiff is entitled to half share while defendants 1 to 3 who are the legal heirs of Chinnama Naidu are entitled to the remaining half share. One Alagan (since dead), the ninth defendant (appellant herein) and the 12th defen




































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top