S.NAINAR SUNDARAM
P. Krishnan – Appellant
Versus
Lakshmi Ammal – Respondent
S. Nainar Sundaram, J.
1. This Second Appeal arises out of a suit for permanent injunction O.S. No. 402 of 1972, on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Poonamallee. The first-defendant is the appellant herein. The plaintiff is the first-respondent. The second-defendant died pending the suit and the third-defendant, who is the second-respondent herein was added as the legal representative. The relationship amongst the parties runs as follows: The second-defendant was the father. One krishnammal was his second wife. The plaintiff, the first-defendant and the third-defendant through his first wife. The suit-property was a joint acquisition by the second-defendant and Krishnammal. The pleas of the defendants that the acquisition in the name of Krishnammal, was only benami for the second-defendant has been rejected by the two Courts below, as having no substance. On 15.9.1971, as per Ex.A.2, there was a Will by the second-defendant and Krishnammal, as per the terms of which the suit-property should go to the plaintiff for her life and thereafter to here grand-children. Krishnammal died on 5.11.1971. On 17.3.1972, as per Ex.B.6, the second-defendant revoked Ex.A.2. On the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.