SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Mad) 399

I 1990 DMC 410
Abdul Hadi, J.
A Hadi
C.B. Chandrasekhar
Versus
Decided on : 8/8/1989
.

A natural guardian can file a petition for Letters of Administration on behalf of a minor without being formally appointed as guardian by the court.

Headnote:

GUARDIANSHIP - APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN - UNNECESSARY - NATURAL GUARDIAN CAN FILE PETITION FOR LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION ON BEHALF OF MINOR - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT, 1925, SECTION 236 - GUARDIAN AND WARDS ACT, 1890, SECTION 4(2) - HINDU MINORITY AND GUARDIANSHIP ACT, 1956, SECTION 4(B), 6.

Fact of the Case:

Petitioner sought to be appointed as guardian of his minor daughter to file a petition for Letters of Administration with the Will annexed, executed by the minor's grandfather, under which the minor was entitled to half share in certain immovable properties.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the petitioner, as the natural guardian of the minor, could directly file a petition for Letters of Administration without the need for a separate petition for appointment as guardian.

Issues: Whether a natural guardian can file a petition for Letters of Administration on behalf of a minor without being formally appointed as guardian by the court.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the following principles: - Section 236 of the Indian Succession Act bars grant of Letters of Administration to a minor due to legal incapacity, but it does not bar their guardian from obtaining Letters of Administration on their behalf. - The definition of 'guardian' under Section 4(2) of the Guardian and Wards Act includes natural guardians. - Section 6 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act recognizes the father as the natural guardian. - The decision in Viramma v. Seshamma, which required a legal guardian to be appointed before obtaining Letters of Administration, is not applicable in this case as it involved a minor who was the sole executor or sole residuary legatee.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the petition, holding that it was unnecessary and that the petitioner could directly file a petition for grant of Letters of Administration with Will annexed on behalf of his minor daughter.

JUDGMENT

Abdul Hadi, J.

1. This Original Petition is for appointing the petitioner as guardian of his minor daughter in order to enable him to file, on her behalf, petition for Letters of Administration with the Will dated 22-7-1981, annexed which was executed by the said minor's grandfather. It is said that under the said Will, the said minor is the legatee, entitled to half share in the immovable properties set out in the schedule to the petition. The petitioner being the father of the said minor, is the natural guardian under Hindu Law. So, I put a question to the learned counsel for the petitioner, asking him whether the petitioner could not, as the natural guardian, file an Original Petition straightway, praying for the above referred to Letters of Administration, without this additional Original Petition for appointing him as a guardian of the said minor. I also pointed out to him that under the Guardian and Wards Act, a person who was natural and lawful guardian, was automatically entitled to exercise the right of a guardian, without any order of Court appointing him and that he need not be formally appointed vide Mt. Ulfat Bibi v. Bafati, AIR 1927 All 581, Rasulan v. Dilawar, and Mistafa v. Inyath Rathima Shah, 89 LW 59. But, he replied that since the Office of this Court insisted that before a petition for Letters of Administration with the Will annexed is filed, he should get himself first appointed by the Court as guardian and then only file a petition for Letters of Administration on behalf of the said minor. I do not think that this view is correct. In Sarajubala v. Jyoti Kamaldas, it has been held that where no executor is appointed under the Will, a petition filed by minor legatee through his natural guardian for grant of Letters of Administration was maintainable in law and that Section 236 of the Indian Succession Act was not a bar to the filing of such a petition. This decision was rendered by a single Judge of the Calcutta High Court on a reference made to him for decision when two Honourable Judges of the said Court had differed on this point of law. Section 236 of the Indian Succession Act says that Letters of Administration cannot be granted to any person, who is a minor. The learned Judge of the Calcutta High Court, who rendered the above said decision took into consideration the following principles set out by him in paragraph 18 of the judgment :--

(a) the provision in the Indian Succession Act as to persons who are entitled to Letters of Administration is not so stringent as that of Probate;

(b) the welfare of the infant or the minor is a paramount consideration and the court should always lean in favour of safeguarding the interests of the minors;

(c) in the matter of administration it ought to follow the interest and a minor may have a large interest in the Estate as in this case.

(d) the property may be in jeopardy; it may be perishable or otherwise;

(e) there is no bar in the Act, to other disqualified persons except persons of unsound mind and no bar about the appointment of minor as an executor;

(f) the bar by necessary implication is not to be favoured;

(g) the language in the Act should not be too strained and in doubtful cases the Letters of Administration may be granted, and lastly--

(h) in the matter of Letters of Administration the court has discretion unlike that in the probate".

Then, the learned Judge concludes by saying 'if we apply these principles to the facts in the instant case, the answer on the point under reference cannot but be plainest possible yes.'

2. Section 236 of the Indian Succession Act rightly bars grant of Letters of Administration to a minor because of his legal in capacity. But it does not bar his guardian, whether natural guardian or a guardian appointed by court, obtaining Letters of Administration on his behalf. The term 'guardian' is defined under Section 4(2) of the Guardian and Wards Act, as the person having the case of the person of a minor or of his property, or of bot

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top