SIVASUBRAMANIAM
Bhargavakula Nainargal Sangam – Appellant
Versus
Arunachala Udayar – Respondent
Sivasubramaniam, J.
1. These second appeals and the civil revision petition have come before us on a reference made by Ratnavel Pandian, J. (as he then was) by his judgment dt. 8-9-1980 made in Second Appeal Nos. 1461 to 11466 of 1980. As the point of law involved in the other matters is also same, they are also posted along with the said second appeals.
2. One Bhargavakula Nainargal Sangam, represented by its President, Dhandapani filed the suit in O.S. Nos. 133 of 1978, 135 of 1978, 137 of 1978, 139 of 1978/141 of 1978, 143 of 1978 and 145 of 1978 on the file of the District Munsif, Vellore for eviction of the defendants from the respective suit properties on the ground that they are the tenants under plaintiff Sangam. It is relevant to point out at the outset that the said suits are filed after the petitions filed before the learned Rent Controller, Vellore were dismissed on the ground that the properties in question are vacant sites and therefore, he has no jurisdiction to entertain the said petitions. The plaintiff shall be referred to as the landlord and the defendants shall be referred to as the tenants for the sake of convenience. The plaintiff-Sangam is the appellant
4. Nachimuthu Mudaliar v. Ponnusami (1980) 1 M.L.J. 529
9. In Swaminathan v. Sundaram Vandayar (1961) 2 M.L.J. 435 at 439
11. Ramaswami Panipoondar v. Mani (1984) 2 M.L.J. 432
1. R. Govindaswamy v. Bhoopalan and Ors. (1977) 2 M.L.J. 206
3. Madhava Raw Naidu v. Sri Gangadeeswarar Temple (1946) 2 M.L.J. 285
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.