A. Abdul Hadi, J.

1. The judgment-debtor has filed this civil revision petition against the order of arrest dated 17.3.1989 in E.P.No. 45 of 1988 on the file of the Sub-Court, Tindivanam. Out of the total decree amount of about Rs. 21,000, the judgment-debtor has been paying certain amounts, on several occasions, which I am told, in all comes to about Rs. 12,500 However, the court below has ordered arrest on 17.3.1989 by simply saying that 'No substantial payment. "Arrest J.D."

2. I find from the certified copy of the above E.P. and the orders passed thereon on several days, culminating in the above said order dated 17.3.1989 that in the said E.P. for arrest and detention of the petitioner judgment-debtor herein in the Civil Prison pursuant to the notice, ordered, he appeared through Counsel and he was making several payments to the extent of Rs. 12,500, and that finally on the ground that no substantial payment was made, arrest was ordered on 17.3.1989, as stated above, I think the said order dated 173.1989 is a misconceived one. After the respondent has appeared before the court and has been also making several payments as stated above, no order of arrest could be made. If at