SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Mad) 392

S.SURYAMURTHY
The Municipal Council, Represented By Its Special Officer – Appellant
Versus
Taj Prakasha Thaikal Estate, Represented By Advocate-Commissioner – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S. Suryamurthy, J.

1. These four appeals have been preferred by the Municipal Council, Tiruvarur, represented by its Special Officer, against the judgments and decrees of the learned Subordinate Judge, Nagapattinam, who dismissed A.S. Nos. 120, 121, 122 and 123 of 1975 as well as the cross-objections preferred against the judgments and decrees of the District Munsif, Tiruvarur, in O.S. Nos. 226, 255, 451 and 513 of 1973 on his file. The suits were instituted by different plaintiffs for a declaration that the general revision and the subsequent increase in tax on the plaintiffs' buildings is illegal and ultra vires and for a permanent injunction restraining the defendant-Municipality from realising any amount as per the demand notices and assessments. The taxes payable by the respective plaintiffs for the properties situate within the Municipal limits of Tiruvarur were revised and enhanced in the general revision of taxes payable for all the properties situate within the Municipal area after an enquiry in the year 1970. The provisions of Section 82 of the Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Act (V of 1920) were complied with for the purpose of the revision, but the provisions










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top