V.RAMASWAMI
Arulandu Udayar, K. S. Soosai Udayar, Iru Sowrimuthu Dayar And P. S. Sowrimuthu Udayar – Appellant
Versus
S. P. Palaniappa Ambalam – Respondent
V. Ramaswami, J.
1. Ariyakudi, Idaiyaur and Vettiur were three villages forming part of the Sivaganga Zamindari. Sometime after the settlement of the Zamindari in 1801, the Zamindar granted in inam certain lands in these villages as a post-settlement dharmilla inam in favour of one Sadhananda Mudaliar. Though the original grant in favour of Sadhananda Mudaliar is not produced, it is evident from the later records that the entirety of the lands comprised in the grant or a major portion of it, were un-reclaimed waste lands and it was given to the grantee or the purpose of reclamation. The conditions of the cowl are not available, but we can safely presume from the subsequent records that Sadhananda Mudaliar was conferred only a kudiwaram interest, in the lands and the melwaram was still vested with the Zamindar. Subsequently, these three villages were granted to certain brahmins and Ariyakudi Sri Thiruvengada Mudayan Devasthanam (hereinafter referred to as the 'Devasthanam') the 14th defendant in the suit. These three villages were later notified and taken over under The Madras Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act (XXVI of 1948), which will hereafter be referre
4. State of Madras v. Ramalinga swamigal Madam and Ors. (1969) 2 M.L.J. 281
5. Krishnaswami Thevar v. Perumal Konar (1961) 1 M.L.J. 168
9. Rainasabapathy Servai v. Sannasi Ambalagaran (1956) 1 M.L.J. 190
1. State of Madras v. Karuppaiah Ambalam 1958 L.W. 155 : (1959) 1 M.L.J. 185
3. State of Madras v. Karuppiah Ambalam (1959) 1 M.L.J. 185 : 1958 L.W. 155
6. A.R. Sanjeevi Naicker v. P.M. Shanmuga Udayar (1965) 2 M.L.J. 204
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.