SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Mad) 317

G.RAMANUJAM
Cheventhipaul Nadar – Appellant
Versus
Srinivasa Nadar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

G. Ramanujam, J.

1. This second appeal was fully heard on 24th August, 1981, and judgment was reserved to this date. When the judgment was about to be pronounced, the learned Counsel appearing for the appellant represents that his client has taken away the papers from him and has withdrawn his authority to appear in this case and as such1 he is retiring from this case. Whatever be the position, since the appeal has been heard and judgment has been reserved, I proceed to deliver the judgment.

2. The plaintiff in O.S. No. 197 of 1972 on the file of the District Munsif, Srivaikuntam in the appellant herein. He filed the said suit for declaration of his title to items 1 to 10 of the plaint first schedule and for an injunction against the defendant restraining them from interfering with the plaintiff's possession thereof. His case as set out in the plaint was as follows :

He, the first defendant and one Rathinaswami Nadar, the husband of the second defendant, were brothers. They orally partitioned most of their common family properties in the year 1967 and in that partition, the plaint first schedule properties comprising 13 items were allotted to the plaintiff, the second schedul









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top