SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Mad) 201

S.RATNAVEL PANDIAN
Bank of Baroda, Represented By Its Chairman – Appellant
Versus
Mahendra Dadha – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S. Ratnavel Pandian, J.

1. The respondent-tenant in H.R.C. No. 705 of 1980, on the file of the Court of the Rent Controller, Madras (XII Judge, Court of Small Causes, Madras), has preferred this revision, questioning the legality and validity of the judgment made by the Appellate Authority (II Judge, Court of Small Causes, Madras in H.R.A. No. 71 of 1981) on his file, setting aside the order of the Rent Controller, dismissing the petition preferred by the landlords (respondents herein) and allowing the appeal and ordering eviction under Section 10(3)(a)(iii) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act (XVIII of 1960), hereinafter referred to as the Act.

2. The brief facts of the case, which gave rise to these proceedings, are as follows: Respondents 1 to 3 herein, who are the sons of late Sri Milapchand Dadha, residing at No. 93, Lloyds Road, Madras-14 filed a petition against the revision petitioner, namely, the Bank of Baroda represented by its Chairman, under Section 10(3)(a)(iii) of the Act, seeking an order of eviction of the tenant from the building and premises bearing door No. 133, Mint Street, Madras-1 on the ground set out in the petition. According to









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top