SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Mad) 431

S.PADMANABHAN
K. Kaliammal – Appellant
Versus
Athi V. Ramachandran – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S. Padmanabhan, J.

1. The Civil Revision Petitions Nos. 2678 and 3066 of 1981 have been filed by the tenants and the landlords respectively against the order passed by the appellate authority (Subordinate Judge, Karur) under the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 (called the Act) in C.M.A. No. 30 of 1980 fixing fair rent for the tenanted premises. The premises in respect of which fair rent has been fixed is a non-residential building, viz., a theatre in Karur. Originally, the building had been leased to one Kuppuswami Gounder the predecessor-in-interest of the tenants on a rent of Rs. 700 per month for the building and Rs. 300 for furniture, etc. While so, the landlords filed R.C.O.P. No. 26 of 1977 for fixation of fair rent for the premises under Section 4 of the Act. The landlord's claimed that a sum of Rs. 4,620 per month would be fair and reasonable. The tenants stated in their counter-affidavit that a sum of Rs. 1,700 per month would be reasonable rent for the building and Rs. 180 for the furniture. The Rent Controller fixed the fair rent for the building at Rs. 2,065 per month and for the furniture at Rs. 200 and consolidated the amount in a sum of






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top