SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Mad) 437

S.PADMANABHAN
R. Mayaperuaml – Appellant
Versus
Azhagappan Nadar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S. Padmanabhan, J.

1. The short question that arises for consideration in these Letters Patent Appeals, which are directed against the common judgment of a single Judge of this Court in A.S. Nos. 473 of 1973 and 282 of 1974 is whether the Azhakianayagi Amman temple situated in S. No. 14020 in Neendakara B village, Agasteeswaram taluk, Kanyakumari district, is a public temple and whether the provisions of the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 (for short the Act) apply to the said temple. Since that is the only question that has been argued before me, it is unnecessary to refer to the detailed facts of the case except to state that the suit was filed by the respondents-plaintiffs for a declaration that the said temple was a private temple and would fall outside the purview of the Act and also to set aside the order passed by the statutory authorities holding that the said temple was a public temple and would attract the provisions of the Act. O.S. No. 42 of 1971 was originally filed by the plaintiffs without issuing a notice to the Commissioner, H.R.&C.E., under Section 80 C.P.C., and O.S. No. 27 of 1972 was filed for the same relief after the notice was issu


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top