P.R.GOKULAKRISHNAN
Ravi Ram – Appellant
Versus
Somasundaram – Respondent
P.R. Gokulakrishnan, J.
1. The tenant is the petitioner in this Civil Revision Petition. In an application filed under Section 11 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) by the landlord, the Rent Controller has found that there are huge arrears of rent amounting to Rs. 15,400 and directed the tenant to deposit the said amount to the credit of the proceedings. As against the determination of arrears of rent under Section 11 (3) of the Act in M P. No. 560 of 1982 in R.C.O.P. No. 2520 of 1982 the tenant preferred R C. A. No. 350 of 1932 The appellate authority took up for determination the question as to whether the tenant can file an appeal without complying with the order of the Rent Controller, and after holding that the tenant cannot prefer an appeal without depositing this amount dismissed the appeal as not maintainable. It is as against this order, the present revision has been filed.
2. Mr. Selvaraj, learned Counsel appearing for the revision petitioner/tenant contends that for an appeal under Section 11(3) of the Act, there is no need to deposit the arrears of rent determined by the Rent Controller. This proposi
1. Iqbal and Company v. Abdul Rahim (1982) 1 M.L.J. 221.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.