SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Mad) 577

P.R.GOKULAKRISHNAN
Ravi Ram – Appellant
Versus
Somasundaram – Respondent


JUDGMENT

P.R. Gokulakrishnan, J.

1. The tenant is the petitioner in this Civil Revision Petition. In an application filed under Section 11 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) by the landlord, the Rent Controller has found that there are huge arrears of rent amounting to Rs. 15,400 and directed the tenant to deposit the said amount to the credit of the proceedings. As against the determination of arrears of rent under Section 11 (3) of the Act in M P. No. 560 of 1982 in R.C.O.P. No. 2520 of 1982 the tenant preferred R C. A. No. 350 of 1932 The appellate authority took up for determination the question as to whether the tenant can file an appeal without complying with the order of the Rent Controller, and after holding that the tenant cannot prefer an appeal without depositing this amount dismissed the appeal as not maintainable. It is as against this order, the present revision has been filed.

2. Mr. Selvaraj, learned Counsel appearing for the revision petitioner/tenant contends that for an appeal under Section 11(3) of the Act, there is no need to deposit the arrears of rent determined by the Rent Controller. This proposi




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top