SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Mad) 115

M.N.CHANDURKAR
K. Janakiraman – Appellant
Versus
Hajee Abdul Sattar – Respondent


ORDER

M.N. Chandurkar, C.J.

1. This is a tenant's revision petition challenging the concurrent findings of both the Rent Control authorities that the premises in occupation of the tenant are bona fide required by the landlord for the immediate purpose of demolishing it and that the landlords want to erect a new building on the site of the old building. The petitioner is one of the three tenants who are in occupation of a portion of the premises which have been purchased by the landlords in 1979. The premises are undoubtedly used for non-residential purposes but the landlords who are father and son want to construct residential premises at the site of the present building. They have already got a plan sanctioned from the Corporation on 1st April, 1981. It is not in dispute that they are will-to-do people and are possessed of necessary amount of Rs. 1,50,000 required for demolition and reconstruction. The stand taken by the tenant petitioner was that the building is quite strong and it does not need to be demolished. The rent control proceedings, according to the tenant, were the result of the tenant not agreeing to pay a higher rent. The Rent Controller on a consideration of the evide




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top