SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Mad) 98

P.R.GOKULAKRISHNAN
Govindaraja Vanniar – Appellant
Versus
Thirusangu Vanniar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

P.R. Gokulakrishnan, J.

1. Defendants 1, 2 and 4 to 7 are the appellants herein. The suit is for delivering possession of the suit properties and also for directing the defendants to pay the damages claimed in the suit and also the profits claimed including that of the future profits from the date of plaint till delivery of the suit properties.

2. The case of the plaintiffs is that one Amalorpava Nadar sold the suit properties to the plaintiffs by three sale deeds dated 13.8.1974. By virtue of the said sale deeds, the plaintiffs have become the owners of the suit properties together with all the trees, superstructures and other appurtenances. The properties were tope on ground overgrown with fruit bearing trees and other trees like casuarina, coconut, mango, jack, palmyrah and other trees. The owners of the suit properties have been using the properties by leasing out the usufructs and there has been a watchman shed in the suit properties. One Kaveri Ammal and Packiri Vanniar were constituted as lessees of the trees in the suit lands and they were using the property by periodically paying the cash rent. The predecessors-in-interest of defendants 2 to 7 filed Q.S. No.266 of 19












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top