SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Mad) 261

V.RATNAM
K. Chinnakannammal – Appellant
Versus
Biharilal S. Lulla – Respondent


ORDER

V. Ratnam, J.

1. The landlady, who succeeded in securing an order for eviction before the Rent Controller on her application filed under Section 10 (3) (c) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 18 of 1960, as amended by Act 23 of 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and lost before the Appellate Authority, is the petitioner in this Civil Revision Petition. The premises in the occupation of the respondent is a portion in the first floor in Door No. 13, Bo Begum Street, Mount Road, Madras-2. The petitioner has two daughters and two sons. The first son of the petitioner, at the time of initiation of proceedings, was about 26 years and her second son was aged about 22 years. The first son of the petitioner was of marriageable age and the petitioner was seeking alliance for his marriage. The second son of the petitioner was pursuing his studies. The petitioner stated that in the event of the marriage of her first son, more accommodation would be required to comfortably house the couple and also to accommodate other relations who may come and stay. The second son, according to the petitioner, also required a separate study room. Besides, of the two daughter





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top