SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Mad) 421

K.VENKATASWAMI
Sri Thulukka Choodamani Mariamman Temple Etc. By Executive Officer, R. Pudupatti – Appellant
Versus
Subramania Pandaram – Respondent


JUDGMENT

K. Venkataswami, J.

1. The 5th defendant in O.S. No. 112 of 1979, on the file of the Court of the District Munsif, Rasipuram is the appellant before me. It appears the suit was filed originally in the Court of the District Munsif, Namakkal as O.S. No. 167 of 1977.

2. Two questions are raised before me by the counsel on both sides as arising out of the judgments and decrees of the courts below. They are, (1) Whether the plaintiffs in O.S. No. 112 of 1979 are entitled to appropriate the coconut bunches and the plantain bunches offered by the worshippers during annual festival in the month of Panguni to the deity of the suit temple, and (2) whether the suit is barred under Section 108 of the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959.

3. The suit temple is Sri Thulukka Choodamani Amman, an ancient temple at Pudupatti village, Rasipuram Taluk. The plaintiffs, four in number, representing the hereditary poojaries of the said suit temple sued the defendants for declaration that they are entitled to receive the tender coconuts and plantain fruits offered to the temple by the worshipping public, at the time of annual festival in the month of Panguni and to restrain the defend



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top