SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Mad) 131

K.VENKATASWAMI, M.N.CHANDURKAR
Dollar Company – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income-Tax – Respondent


JUDGMENT

M.N. Chandurkar, C.J.

1. The assessee carries on the business of manufacture and sale of pharmaceutical products. Its factory is admittedly situated on a piece of land of an extent of 7 grounds 310 sq. ft. which is covered by Tondiarpet, III Area, Town Planning Scheme. The Corporation of Madras made a demand on the assessee for payment of betterment contribution commonly called betterment tax of Rs. 2,406.09, Rs. 3,208.13 and Rs. 4,010-10 for the years 1969-70, 1970-71 and 1971-72 respectively. The contribution was demanded at the rate of 7.5 per cent. on the difference between the value of the land as fixed by the Arbitrator, namely, Rs. 1,500 per ground and the market value taken for the above-mentioned three years, namely, Rs. 6,000, Rs. 7,500 and Rs. 9,000 per ground, respectively. On the assessee disputing the quantum of demand, the Corporation agreed to receive a lump sum payment of Rs. 7,984.67 on the basis of a flat rate of Rs. 1,120 per ground. This amount was accordingly paid to the Corporation of Madras on July 23, 1975.

2. In the assessment proceedings for the assessment year 1975-76, the assessee claimed an amount of Rs. 7,985 as deductible being payment of bette





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top