SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Mad) 108

S.NATARAJAN
R. R. Dinakaran – Appellant
Versus
S. L. Chinnakuppuswami – Respondent


ORDER

S. Natarajan, J.

1. This revision under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act (1960), hereinafter referred to as the Act, has been preferred by a tenant, who is aggrieved against an order of eviction passed by the appellate authority against him under Section 10 (2)(iii) of the Act.

2. Admittedly the respondent herein, who is the landlord, has leased out the petition premises to the petitioner for nonresidential purposes, to wit, running a hotel. Originally the petitioner had taken the building on lease from the respondent's father, but subsequently on partition in the family, the petitioner had attorned the tenancy to the respondent and has been paying the agreed rent of Rs. 100 per month. On the ground that the tenant had committed acts of waste in the building and thereby impaired materially the value and utility of the building, the respondent filed R.C.O.P. No. 559 of 1978 under Section 10(2)(iii) of the Act for evicting the petitioner. Besides recording the evidence of the parties in the "enquiry" before him, the Rent Controller also issued a warrant of commission and had the premises inspected by an Advocate-Commissioner. The Advocate Commiss

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top