SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Mad) 462

SATHIADEV, MAHESWARAN
S. Guhan – Appellant
Versus
Rukmini Devi Arundale – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sathiadev, J.

1. O.S.A. 113 of 1986 is preferred by three persons of which first appellant is a member of the Executive Committee of Kalakshetra, a Society registered under the Societies Registration Act, the second appellant is a life member of the Society and the third appellant is not only a life member but also member of its Executive Committee. They sought for leave to present the appeal against the judgment in C.S. 716 of 1985 and also to condone the delay in preferring the said appeal in C.M.P. Nos. 935 and 5269 of 1980 and leave was granted on 16-4-1980.

2. O.S.A. 192 of 1986 is filed by fourth defendant in C.S. No. 716 of 1985. Both the appeals are preferred against the scheme decree passed in the said suit No. on 20-111985. C.S. 716 of 1986 (A) was filed on the Original Side of this Court under S. 92(1) and 0. VII, R. 1, C.P.C. by three plaintiffs claiming that they are persons having interest in the Trust called 'Kalakshetra'.

3. In the plaint, it is stated as follows: -'Kalakshetra, the first defendant, was founded by the first plaintiff. Rukmani Devi Arundale in or about 1936, as a public charitable trust. She was the Founder life trustee Director of the Trust. Sh
























































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top