SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Mad) 38

M.N.CHANDURKAR
Bombay Tyres International Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Express Newspapers Private Ltd. – Respondent


ORDER

M.N. Chandrukar, C.J.

1. All these three revision petitions two of which are by the tenant and one by the landlord, raise a question with regard to the correctness of the fair rent fixed in respect of premises which are situated on the Mount Road, Madras, with a built up area of 18,047 sq. ft., 13,967 sq. ft., are covered by Go-down and 4,080 sq.ft. are covered by office premises.

2. The original agreed rent was Rs. 3,000 per month. The landlord filed an application for fixation of fair rent claiming Rs. 18,000 per month. The Rent Controller fixed the fair rent at Rs. 6,801 per month. Against this order both the landlord and the tenant went in appeal. The tenant's appeal came to be dismissed. The landlord appeal came to be allowed partly and the fair rent was fixed at Rs. 9,825 per month. Since the appellate order was passed in two appeals, one by the tenant and the other by the landlord, two revision petitions came to be filed by the tenant being C.R.P. Nos. 2491 and 2492 of 1983. Strictly speaking, since there is a common order, which arises out of proceedings started only on one petition, two revision petitions do not appear to be necessary at all and it would have been perfe




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top