SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Mad) 39

M.N.CHANDURKAR
C. Ranganathan – Appellant
Versus
M. Suri – Respondent


ORDER

M.N. Chandurkar, C.J.

1. Both these revision petitions can be disposed of by a common order as both of them arise out of an eviction petition filed under Section 10(2)(i) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as the Rent Control Act).

2. The petitioner is the owner of premises No. 6 Sivaparakasa Mudaliar Road, T. Nagar, Madras-17, the southern portion in the ground floor of which is occupied by the respondent as a tenant. Originally, the monthly rent for the premises was Rs. 100. As according to the landlord the rent paid by the tenant was low, he filed a petition under Section 4 of the Rent Control Act, being H.R.C. No. 1922 of 1978. The Rent Controller fixed the fair rent of the premises at Rs. 236. Both the landlord and the tenant filed appeals against this order of the then Rent Controller. The Appellate Authority allowed the appeal filed by the landlord and fixed the fair rent at Rs. 267 by an order dated 20.4.1981. By the same order, the Appellate Authority dismissed the appeal filed by the tenant. It is not in dispute that the fair rent fixed became effective from 19.7.1987 which was the date on which the petition under Se


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top