SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Mad) 290

NAINAR SUNDARAM
Ammayappan – Appellant
Versus
The Additional Collector In-Charge And Collector – Respondent


ORDER

Nainar Sundaram, J.

1. The matter arises under the Tamil Nadu Agricultural Lands Records of Tenancy Rights Act X of 1969, hereinafter referred to as the Act. The petitioner claims himself to be a tenant under the Act. The lands belong to a trust. It is stated that respondents 4 to 8 are the trustees. Respondents 9 to 12 claim themselves to be alienees of the lands in question. The lands were originally demised by way of lease to one Kuttianna Gounder, who is no more. According to the petitioner, he being the son of the said Kuttianna Gounder continued to be in possession of the lands as the cultivating tenant and hence he must be recorded as such under the Act. The third-respondent did not countenance this plea of the petitioner. The order of the third-respondent is dated 6.8.1979. Anterior to the order of the third-respondent, the petitioner was obliged to move the civil Court in O.S.No. 222 of 1977 on the file the District Munsif, Karur, against respondents 9 to 12 to ask for the relief of injunction to maintain his possession as a cultivating tenant. That suit, in spite of contest by respondents 9 to 12 herein the defendants in that suit, was decreed on 22-6-1978. As against




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top