SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Mad) 392

SIVASUBRAMANIAM
V. R. Arunachalam Chettiar – Appellant
Versus
Vayinagaram – Respondent


ORDER

Sivasubramaniam, J.

1. This revision petition is directed against an order in IA. No. 430 of 1984 in O.S. No. 97 of 1983 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Madurai.

2. The facts leading to the filing of this revision petition ate as follows :- The respondents 1 to 5 herein as plaintiffs filed the said suit against the petitioner and the sixth respondent herein as defendants 1 and 2 and another one O.R. Arunachalam Chettiar, who was the third defendant in the said suit, for framing a scheme and for other reliefs. The suit was filed in a representative capacity by the plaintiffs Under Order 1, Rules 8, C.P.C. Even before the summons were served on the third defendant, the third defendant died on 14.7.1983. This fact was intimated to the Court on 5.8.1983 and thereafter, the plaintiffs filed a petition in I.A. No. 236 of 1984 under Order 22, Rule 4, C.P.C. for setting aside the abatement and to implead the legal representative of the deceased third defendant. As the said application was not filed within ninety days from the date of death of the third defendant; it was dismissed on 28.7.1984; During the pendency of the said application, defendants 1 and 2 filed a memo i










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top