Srinivasan, J.

1. This Second appeal arises out of a suit for eviction filed by the lessor who was a trust against the appellant. Both the Courts below have granted a decree in favour of the plaintiff not only for possession but also for a sum of Rs. 915.80 by way of arrears of rent. The suit was originally filed by the trust represented by its Managing Trustee. When the appeal before the lower appellate Court was pending, respondents 2 to 4 herein filed two applications by one of which they sought to come on record as parties on the footing that they had become the owners of the property by virtue of a registered exchange deed dated 26.5.1982. By the other application the respondents 2 to 4 sought the permission of the Court to be represented by their power of attorney agent by name Raja Madhava Kalanidhi. Both the applications were ordered by the lower appellate Court, and two revision petitions were filed by the present appellant. They were numbered as C.R.P. Nos. 5223 and 5224 of 1983. They were disposed of by a common order dated 11.1.1984 which is in the following terms:

I do not think there is any legal infirmity in the order impleading the respondents herein in A.S. N