SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Mad) 446

SIVASUBRAMANIAM
Syed Shafee – Appellant
Versus
S. Asmath Basha – Respondent


ORDER

Sivasubramaniam, J.

1. The unsuccessful tenants in R.C.O.P. No. 32 of 1983 on the file of the learned Rent Controller (XI Judge, Court of Small Causes),Madras, and in the appeals in R.C.A. No. 141 and 172 of 1985 on the file of the appellate authority (VIII Judge, Court of Small Causes), Madras, are the petitioners in these revision petitions. The respondents are the landlords.

2. The respondents, landlords, filed the petition in R.C.O.P. No. 32 of 1983, for eviction of the tenants on the grounds of sub-letting and owner's occupation. They contended that both of them purchased the building on 25-4-1981 under two separate sale deeds and the first petitioner was a tenant at that time. He had attorned the tenancy in favour of the respondents and subsequently the first petitioner has sublet the premises to one Mrs. Khursheed Begum, who was added as the 3rd respondent, in the eviction petition, without the written permission of the respondents herein. It is their further case that the respondents do not own any house in the City of Madras, that both of them require the petition-premises for their own use and occupation and that their requirement is bona fide.

3. The petitioners herein


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top