M.N.CHANDURKAR
S. Sarangapani Iyengar – Appellant
Versus
The Asst. Commr. Urban Land Tax – Respondent
M.N. Chandurkar, C.J.
1. This revision is directed against the order of the Urban Land Tax Tribunal, Chingleput (hereinafter referred to as the 'Tribunal') holding that the agricultural lands in S. Nos. 27/2, 27/4A and 125/4 are liable to be assessed to Urban Land Tax.
2. The petitioner is the owner of the above mentioned lands in Sithalpakkam Village which have been assessed to Urban Land Tax under the Urban Land Tax Act, 1966 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act) by the Assistant Commissioner of Urban Land Tax. This assessment has been upheld by the Tribunal holding that the lands have been kept vacant during the fasli years 1381 to 1385 and the lands cannot, therefore, be held to be agricultural lands.
3. The contention which is raised in this revision petition on behalf of the petitioner is that being agricultural lands, they are not liable to assessment to Urban Land Tax. The learned Additional Government Pleader, however, contended that the only land which is exempted from being assessed is land which is registered as wet in the revenue accounts of the Government and used for the cultivation of wet crops as contemplated by the definition of 'Urban land' in Section 2(13). It
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.