SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Mad) 375

SRINIVASAN
Gnanasigamani Nadar, Represented By M. G. Jayapandian Tuticorin – Appellant
Versus
Canara Bank – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Srinivasan, J.

1. This case raises a question, which according to learned Counsel has not come up for consideration so far in any Court. In short, the question is whether an intermediary Bank which has merely communicated to the beneficiary the letters of credit opened by a Foreign Bank is entitled to get a refund of the amount paid by it to a person who discounted the bill drawn by the beneficiary after it is found that the foreign Bank never existed.

2. The relevant facts are these: The 9th defendant in the suit, hereinafter referred to as the 'seller' purported to enter into a contract for supply of sun glasses with M/s. Olerewagu Loadipupo, Esq.6, Dabira Street, Shomulu, Lagos in Nigeria hereinafter referred to as the 'buyer'. The plaintiff received a communication dated 25.9.1971 from British Trust and Saving Corporation Ltd., Lagos, Nigeria, hereinafter referred to as the 'Foreign Bank' requesting for a notification to the seller of an irrevocable letter of credit opened by the Foreign Bank with the plaintiff by order of the buyer along with the communication an irrevocable letter of credit for an amount of ...3845 was sent to the plaintiff. It was expressly stated in t






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top