SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Mad) 376

SRINIVASAN
Kasoar Udayar – Appellant
Versus
M. V. R. Oorani Private Trust, Through Its Managing Trustee P. S. Ramanatha Chettiar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Srinivasan, J.

1. This petition for condonation of delay of 33 days in filing the revision petition has been posted before me on an office note objection to the maintainability thereof.

2. The petitioner who suffered an order of eviction in R.C.O.P.No. 46 of 1984, District Munsif's Court, Devakottai, preferred an appeal R.C.A.3 of 1985 in the Court of Subordinate Judge, Devakottai. The appeal was dismissed on 27.6.1988. The petitioner filed an application for certified copies on 4.8.1988 and they were ready on 17.8.1988. The petitioner presented the C.R.P.on 12.9.1988. In this Court along with a petition to condone the delay of 33 days.

3. Under Section 25(2) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act (XVIII of 1960) as amended by Art XXIII of 1973, hereinafter referred to as the 'Act' an application to this Court for the exercise of its power of revision under Sub-section (1) of Section 25 shall be preferred within one month from the date on which the order of the appellate authority is communicated to the appellant. There is a proviso to Sub-section 2 of Section 25 of the Act which gives a discretion to this Court to allow further time not exceeding one month f













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top