SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Mad) 500

K.M.NATARAJAN
Saroja – Appellant
Versus
Arumugham – Respondent


JUDGMENT

K.M. Natarajan, J.

1. These two appeals were filed by the unsuccessful wife before the lower appellate court.

2. The facts which are necessary for the disposal of these two appeals are briefly as follows: The appellant herein (wife) filed O.P. No. 144 of 1978 before the Principal Sub Judge, Cuddalore, under Section 9(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act for restitution of conjugal rights, and after summons were received in the above proceedings, the husband, who is the respondent in these appeals, filed O.P. No. 158 of 1978 for dissolution of Marriage under Section 13(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act on the ground of desertion. The case of the appellant is that she married the respondent on 16-9-1967 according to Hindu sastras in her husband's house in Melkangay-ankuppam. Thereafter they lived together at Melkangayankuppam for some time and later at Thiruvannamalai where the respondent was working as Assistant Professor in Government College. In September, 1968, she gave birth to a female child by name Meenakshi and in April, 1972, she gave birth to another female child by name Dhanalakshmi. After the birth of the second child, she returned to her husband's house and lived with him for a





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top