K.M. Natarajan, J.

1. This revision is directed by the second defendant against the exparte order of ad-interim injunction passed by the IV Assistant City Civil Judge, Mad. in I.A.No. 17289 of 1988. The respondents-plaintiffs filed the suit O.S.No. 9891 of 1988 against the revision-petitioner and the Corporation of Madras, for a declaration that the construction already put up by the revision-petitioner herein is illegal and for a consequential relief of permanent injunction restraining the revision-petitioner from doing further construction and also for a mandatory injunction directing him to demolish the construction already put up and also to direct the Corporation of Madras to take action against the revision-petitioner. The plaintiffs prayed for ad-interim injunction in I.A.No. 17289 of 1988 restraining the revision-petitioner, who is the second defendant and his men from putting up any construction over and above the existing construction over the schedule mentioned property pending disposal of the suit. In that petition, the IV Assistant City Civil Judge passed an order as follows:

Head Perused the documents. I am satisfied that the petitioner is entitled to ad-interim in