P. Venugopal, J.

1. The plaintiff is the appellant before this Court and the defendants are the respondents. The suit property originally belonged to plaintiff's husband Seetharama Goundar. Under the original of Exhibit A-1, the said Seetharama Goundar settled the suit property in favour of his wife, the plaintiff herein. On the basis of the settlement deed, the, plaintiff has filed the suit for declaration of her title to the suit property and for recovery of possession of the suit property from the defendants. The first defendant contended that the settlement deed (Exhibit A-1) was never acted upon, and Seetharama Goundar himself has revoked the settlement deed under Exhibit B-5 and he is a bona fide purchaser for value from Seetharama Goundar under Exhibit B-1 and the plaintiff is not entitled to a decision and recovery of possession as prayed for. The trial Court held that a valid settlement has been executed in favour of the plaintiff under the original of Exhibit A-1 and the subsequent revocation deed (Exhibit B-5) is an invalid instrument and will not in any way affect the rights of the plaintiff to the suit property. The trial Court further held that the first defend