SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Mad) 2206

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P. Sathasivam and S. Manikumar, JJ.
Union of India, rep. by Chief Personnel Officer, Southern Railway, Chennai and Others
Versus
Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal, Chennai and Another
Review Application No. 13 of 2006 and W.P.M.P. No. 17188 of 2006.
Decided On : 30 August 2006

Advocates Appeared:
R. Gandhi, Senior Counsel, for V.G. Sureshkumar, for Applicants
S.J. Jagadev, for Respondent No. 2.

A reserved community candidate would become eligible for promotion only if he is successful in written examination and viva voce.

Headnote:Service Law - Promotion- Community status - Even a reserved community candidate is not entitled to any relaxation and would become eligible for promotion only if he is successful in written examination and viva voce - Employee has to undergo selection process.

ORDER

Per P. SATHASIVAM, J.

Officers of the Railway Administration are the applicants in this Review Application.

2. The Railway Administration, aggrieved by the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench, dated 19.7.2005, made in O.A. No. 882 of 2004, filed W.P. No. 36108 of 2005 before this Court, which was dismissed at the admission stage, confirming the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal.

The second respondent herein, viz., M. Sathiamurthy, joined Railways on 5.1.1979 as Apprentice Mechanic (Junior Engineer Grade-II) against unreserved vacancy through Railway Recruitment Board. At the time of his appointment, he had mentioned his community status as ‘Hindu’ (not specifically mentioned his caste). Treating him as an unreserved candidate, the Administration promoted him as Junior Engineer Grade-I with effect from 1.8.1982 on ad hoc basis and

regularised as such from 1.1.1984. In the meantime, he had produced a Community Certificate issued by the Deputy Tahsildar, Manapparai, claiming that he belongs to Uraly caste, which is coming under ST Community. The administration advised him to obtain Community Certificate from the competent authority. Again, he produced a Community Certificate issued by the Special Tahsildar, Adi-Dravida Welfare, during 1984 and claimed the status of belonging to Scheduled Tribe. Ultimately, he produced a Community Certificate from the Revenue Divisional Officer, Trichy, during 1997 and the matter was referred to the District Collector, Trichy, to ascertain the genuineness.

In the meantime, the second respondent filed a suit before the Sub-Court, Trichy, in O.S. No. 367 of 2001 for declaration that he belongs to Uraly caste which is coming under ST community and O.A. No. 39 of 2002 before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench. Subsequently, he withdrew the suit in O.S. No. 367 of 2001 on 26.8.2003. The Tribunal, by its order dated 30.4.2002, directed the applicants/Railways to treat the second respondent as a Scheduled Tribe candidate with effect from April 1984 on the basis of the Certificate issued by the Special Tahsildar, Adi-Dravida Welfare. As against the said order, W.P. No. 39888 of 2002 was filed before this Court and the same is pending as on date.

In the meanwhile, the second respondent filed another Application before the Tribunal in O.A. No. 461 of 2004, praying for a direction to the Railway Administration to promote him to Group “B” service from 1991 and to grant actual benefits etc. The Tribunal disposed of the said Application with a direction to the Railway Administration to consider the representations of the second respondent dated 3.11.2003 and 29.2.2004 in accordance with Rules. Accordingly, those representations were disposed of by the General Manager, Southern Railway, under letter dated 13.7.2004. The second respondent was advised that, due to revision of seniority, he did not find a place within the zone of consideration arrived at three times the number of vacancies for the selection held during the year 1991. Even after applying the relaxed standards as provided in para 203.6 of IREM (Indian Railway Establishment Manual), his name did not come in the extended zone of consideration for Group “B” selection. Aggrieved by the disposal of the representation by which his claims were turned down, the second respondent filed another Original Application, viz., O.A. No. 882 of 2004, before the Tribunal, challenging the said disposal and also seeking for a direction to promote him as Foreman Grade “B” from 1.7.1985; Foreman Grade “A” from 1.7.1987; and to grant Group “B” promotion against ST vacancies that arose against 70% regular selection from 1991 or on par with his junior G. Chandrasekaran, who was promoted to Group “B” service with effect from 28.12.1995. The said Original Application was allowed with a direction to the Railways to grant all the monetary benefits to him within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the order copy. Ch




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top