SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Mad) 427

S.K.KRISHNAN
Sarasu – Appellant
Versus
Karuppa Gounder and others – Respondent


Advocates:
M.Duraisamy, for Appellant.
K.Ramanraj, for Respondents.

JUDGMENT: Aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 20.7.1992 passed in A.S.No.17 of 1992 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Namakkal reversing the judgment and decree dated 20.8.1991 made in O.S.No.568 of 1985 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Namakkal, the defendant has come forward with this second appeal.

2. The case of the plaintiff, in-brief, is as follows:

On 24.3.1960, the father of the first plaintiff has settled the entire lands in S.No.122/1, 122/9 and a half in S.No.122/2 to the plaintiffs through a settlement deed and the plaintiffs have been enjoying the same. Entire lands in S.Nos.122/3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and a half in S.No.122/2 are entitled to the husband of the defendant. There is a Well in the southern west corner in S.No.122/2. On the north and upper side of the land in S.No.122, there is a river canal. On the southern side of the above said well, there is a pathway which leads to the land of the husband of the first defendant. The land in S.No.122/1, which is shown as P P1, belonging to the plaintiffs. Prior to the purchase of the land in S.No.125/7 by the defendant, she asked for a pathway in the land, which is shown as P, of the plaintiffs.





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top