SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Mad) 1119

A.R.RAMALINGAM
Unnamalai alias Vimala – Appellant
Versus
P. Subramanian – Respondent


Advocates:
P.A.Kadirvel, for Petitioner.
V.Meenakshisundaram, for Respondent.

ORDER: This reivision has been filed against the order passed by the Additional District Sessions and Fast Track Court No.1, Tindivanam in Crl.R.P.No.1 of 2003, whereby the maintenance amount of Rs.200 p.m. has been ordered to be paid by the respondent in favour of Unnamalai alias Vimala, the petitioner.

2. One Unnamalai alias Vimala alleging that she is the wife of P.Subramanian, filed M.P.No.3 of 2000, before the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Thindivanam under Sec.125, Crl.P.C. claiming maintenance of Rs.500.

3. The said maintenance case was resisted by the husband Subramanian by saying that the petitioner Unnamalai has separated herself 30 years back and she is living separately and even before the marriage between Unnamalai and Subramanian, she was suffering from leprosay and suppressing the said disease, she was married to Subramanian and however, after some years, the said Unnamalai separated herself from Subramanian is living separately and further the said Unnamalai is having lands of 3 acres and 70 cents with pump set etc., and owning separate house and she is getting income of Rs.40,000 per year and that there was already civil suit between the parties and then through the vill







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top