SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Mad) 482

R.BANUMATHI
Francisca Pandian – Appellant
Versus
Joseph and another . . . – Respondent


Advocates:
K.Srinivasan, for Petitioner.

ORDER: This civil revision petition is directed against the order of District Munsif, Srivaikuntam dated 3.12.2002 in I.A.No.775 of 2002 in O.S.No.136 of 2001, dismissing the petition filed under O.8, Rule 9, C.P.C. - receipt of reply statement filed by the plaintiff. Revision petitioner is the plaintiff.

2. Relevant facts necessitated for disposal of this civil revision petition could briefly be stated thus:

Suit property relates to

Nazereth village

Punjai Land S.No.220/1. . . 7.18 acres on the

North Eastern side

Out of 9.38 acres

New Sub-Division . . . . 220/1A.

Case of the plaintiff is that the suit property belonged to her mother - Gnanammal. Plaintiff’s mother - Gnanammal executed a settlement deed in respect of the plaint first schedule property in favour of the plaintiff. On 18.9.1996 and 26.6.1997, the plaintiff alienated a portion of the first schedule property. The plaintiff claims to be in exclusive possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property, In the month of September, 2000, the second defendant gave a petition, denying the title of the plaintiff to the Tahsildar. Upon enquiry, on 21.8.2001, the Tahsildar, Tiruchendur, cancelled the Patta issued in favour o














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top