R.BANUMATHI
Francisca Pandian – Appellant
Versus
Joseph and another . . . – Respondent
2. Relevant facts necessitated for disposal of this civil revision petition could briefly be stated thus:
Suit property relates to
Nazereth village
Punjai Land S.No.220/1. . . 7.18 acres on the
North Eastern side
Out of 9.38 acres
New Sub-Division . . . . 220/1A.
Case of the plaintiff is that the suit property belonged to her mother - Gnanammal. Plaintiff’s mother - Gnanammal executed a settlement deed in respect of the plaint first schedule property in favour of the plaintiff. On 18.9.1996 and 26.6.1997, the plaintiff alienated a portion of the first schedule property. The plaintiff claims to be in exclusive possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property, In the month of September, 2000, the second defendant gave a petition, denying the title of the plaintiff to the Tahsildar. Upon enquiry, on 21.8.2001, the Tahsildar, Tiruchendur, cancelled the Patta issued in favour o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.