SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Mad) 495

S.SARDAR ZACKRIA HUSSAIN
Rohini – Appellant
Versus
R. Durairaj – Respondent


Advocates:
N.S.Mukundun, for Petitioner.
P. Valliappan. for M/.s.Sarvabhaunan Associates, for Respondent.

ORDER: The wife is the revision petitioner and the revision is directed against the order passed by the Family Court. Coimbatore, in I.A.No.436 of 2002, which is filed for claiming interim maintenance from the respondent/husband at the rate of Rs 10,000 per month, Rs 2,500 towards house rent per month and also a sum of Rs 15.000 towards legal expenses.

2.The petition for interim maintenance was opposed by the respondent and in his counter, he has stated that the petitioner is in a position to maintain herself and she is getting income from the ancestral properties in which she has got 1/3rd share. It is further stated in the counter that one of the ancestral properties situated in G.S.Nos.174/1 and 174/2 in Ganapathy P.N.Palayam measuring about 90 cents of land and building, from which a sum of Rs30,000 is getting by way of monthly rent, in which the share of the petitioner is Rs. 10,000 per month. The petitioner has also got l/3rd share in the properties situated at door Nos.295 to 305 in Sarojini Street, Sidhapudur. It is further stated the petitioner has got l/3rd share in the house properties situated at doorNos.123 tol26 in N.G.R Street, P.N.Palayam, in which one of the houses








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top