S.SARDAR ZACKRIA HUSSAIN
Rohini – Appellant
Versus
R. Durairaj – Respondent
2.The petition for interim maintenance was opposed by the respondent and in his counter, he has stated that the petitioner is in a position to maintain herself and she is getting income from the ancestral properties in which she has got 1/3rd share. It is further stated in the counter that one of the ancestral properties situated in G.S.Nos.174/1 and 174/2 in Ganapathy P.N.Palayam measuring about 90 cents of land and building, from which a sum of Rs30,000 is getting by way of monthly rent, in which the share of the petitioner is Rs. 10,000 per month. The petitioner has also got l/3rd share in the properties situated at door Nos.295 to 305 in Sarojini Street, Sidhapudur. It is further stated the petitioner has got l/3rd share in the house properties situated at doorNos.123 tol26 in N.G.R Street, P.N.Palayam, in which one of the houses
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.