S.K.KRISHNAN
Munusamy Gounder and another – Appellant
Versus
Sadasivam – Respondent
2. The case of the plaintiff-in-brief is as follows: (a) The suit properties originally belonged to one Govindasamy Gounder, who is the father-in-law of the plaintiff. He had been in possession and enjoyment of the same for over many years. All the revenue records were standing in the name of the said Govindasamy Gounder. (b) On various dates during the year 1960, the said Govindasamy Gounder purchased the items 3 to 7 referred to in the plaint schedule from the first defendant by way of oral purchase and he obtained items 1 and 2 from his mother Periyamukkal Muniammal. Thereafter, the said Govindasamy Gounder had executed a settlement deed in favour of his wife Ambujammal on 17.11.1961. The said Ambujammal enjoyed that property as an absolute owner and during the course of her enjoyment she mortgaged the property to one Ramaiah and one Devendran under the registered mortgage deeds dated 18.8.1975 and 5.6.1980 respectively. Later
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.