PRABHA SRIDEVAN
India Household and Health Care Limited, represented by its Vice Chairman and Managing Director, Chennai – Appellant
Versus
LG Household and Health Care Limited, represented by its CEO and President, the Republic of Korea and others – Respondent
2. Reference to parties will be in accordance with their array in Application No.267 of 2005.
3. The applicant filed C.S.No.207 of 2005 for a declaration that the notice of termination dated 5.2.2005 issued by the first respondent, terminating the Memorandum of Understanding dated 5.3.2004 entered into between the applicant and the respondents is illegal, null and void and for a permanent injunction restraining respondents 1 to 3 from importing/manufacturing in India, any kind of cosmetic products with the LG logo for sale and also for a permanent mandatory injunction directing the first respondent to supply all types of LG cosmetic products under the LG cosmetics brand name “LACVERT”, “E’ZUP”, “EXPRIM” and “ISAKNOX” with the LG logo to the applicant for sale in India.
4. According to the applicant, the first respondent has entered into a Memorandum of Understanding on 1.11.2003 with the applicant for distribution and marketing of their FMCG with LG logo in India. The suit is not concerned with
Central Bank of India Limited v. Hariford Fire Insurance Company Limited A.I.R. 1965 S.C. 1288
Dr. Mool Chand v. Karukshetra University A.I.R. 1968 S.C . 292
Indian oil Corporation Limited v. Amritsar Gas Services [1991] 1 S.C.C. 533
Shri Vidhya Ram Misra v. Managing Committee
Her Highness Maharani Shantidevi P. Gaikwad v. Savjibhai Haribhai Patel [2001] 5 S.C.C. . 101
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.