S.SARDAR ZACKRIA HUSSAIN
Ramasamy Pandithar – Appellant
Versus
Ramalinga Kounder – Respondent
2. In the affidavit filed in support of the said amendment petition, the plaintiff has stated that after filing of the suit, the respondent/defendant trespassed into a portion of his property on the South and therefore, recovery of possession is
also to be sought for, for which purpose, the plaintiff filed the amendment petition as stated in the petition.
3. The amendment petition was opposed in the counter that though the plaintiff was fully aware, even at the stage of trial that the defendant is in possession of ‘B’ schedule property, no step has been taken to amend the plaint at that stage. No petition was filed to amend the plaint seeking recovery of possession before evidence was let in or before the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.