SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Mad) 472

S.SARDAR ZACKRIA HUSSAIN
T. S. Ramu – Appellant
Versus
Neelakandan – Respondent


Advocates:
V.V.Krishnamoorthy, for Petitioner.
T.Thirumaran, for Respondent.

ORDER: The tenant is the revision petitioner. The revision is filed against the dismissal of M.P.No.367 of 2001 in R.C.A.No.529 of 1997 on the file of the Rent Control Appellate Authority (VIII Judge, Court of Small Causes), Madras.

2. The respondent as landlord filed R.C.O.P.No.2216 of 1995 in the Rent Control Court (XII Judge, Court of Small Causes), Madras under Sec.4 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 for fixation of fair rent in respect of the petition non-residential premises bearing No.86, Subramania Swamy Koil Street, Saidapet, Madras-15, subject matter of this civil revision petition. The learned Rent Controller considering the evidence of P.W.1, Engineer examined on the side of the landlord and that of the tenant as R.W.1 and the Engineer R.W.2 examined on the side of the tenant and also Exs.P-1 to P-3 marked on the side of the landlord fixed the fair rent at Rs.498 per month. Against that order the tenant filed the Rent Control Appeal No.529 of 1997.

3. During the pendency of the Rent Control Appeal No.529 of 1997, the tenant filed M.P.No.367 of 2001 seeking appointment of advocate-Commissioner to find out the actual area under the occupation of









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top