IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
B.Subhashan Reddy, C.J. and K.Gnanaprakasam, J.
State of Tamil Nadu, represented by its Secretary to Government, Industries Department, Chennai and another
Versus
P.Krishnamoorthy and others
W.A.Nos.3241 and 3242, etc. of 2003
Decided On : 11 May 2004
2. There are 135 sand quarries in Government lands and 52 in patta lands. Leases, which have been granted earlier, expire in the years 2003, 2004,2005 and 2006. Such numbers are 19, 102, 33 and 33 respectively. May be in some cases sand quarry is being done under the orders of the Court when the leases were either not granted or due to delay by the government in disposal of applications. Still there are number of applications pending seeking for lease, but that is a question apart as we are required to decide only the rights of the existing lessees or the persons quarrying under Court orders.
3. This litigation arose because of the issuance of G.O.Ms.No.95, Industries (MMC.I) Department, dated 1.10.2003 inserting Rule 38A to the Rules, making it enforceable from the next day i.e., 2.10.2003. The same reads as follows:
"GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU ABSTRACT
Mines and Quarries - Minor Minerals - Tamil Nadu Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1959 - Introduction of Rule - 38A - Amendment to Tamil Nadu Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1959 - Notification - Issued.
INDUSTRIES (MMC.I) DEPARTMENT G.O.Ms.No.95 Dated: 1.10.2003
Read:
G.O.2(D) No.46, Industries Department dated 25.9.2003
ORDER:
Taking cognizance of the indiscriminate quarrying in the river systems of Tamil Nadu in a Public Interest Litigation, the Hon’ble High Court in their order dated 26.7.2002 had directed the State Government to constitute a Committee of Experts consisting of geologist, environmentalist and scientist to study the river and river beds in the State with reference to the impact of sand quarrying. Accordingly, the Government in the G.O. read above constituted a six member High Level Committee. The Committee after extensive touring of the river systems of the State has submitted its report to the Government. A copy of the report has been furnished to the Hon’ble High Court. The High Court, while ordering the Government to constitute the High Level Committee had also directed-
“The Government on receipt of the report from the Committee shall act in conformity with the guidelines and take all necessary further steps to arrest the exploitation and to protect and improve the situation and restore status quo-ante. The Government shall pass suitable regulatory legislation in this regard. The action on the part of the Government after the receipt of the report should not brook any delay, it should act fast.”
2. The High Level Committee in its report has pointed out that illicit and haphazard sand mining has led to deepening of the river beds, widening of the rivers, damage to civil structures, depletion of groundwater table
Bihar School Examination Board v. Subhas Chandra Sinha [1970] 1 S.C.C. 648
MRF Limited v. Inspector of Kerala Government [1998] 8 S.C.C. 227
State of Haryana v. Rama Kishan A.I.R. 1988 S.C. 1301
Gem Granites v. State of Tamil Nadu [1995] 2 S.C.C. 413
State of Tamil Nadu v. M/s. Hind Stone A.I.R. 1981 S.C. 711; [1981] 94 L.W. 89
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.