SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Mad) 743

S.ASHOK KUMAR
Susai and others – Appellant
Versus
Sowriammal – Respondent


Advocates:
Valliappan, for M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates, for Appellants.
K.Kannan, for Respondent.

JUDGMENT: This second appeal has been preferred against the judgment and decree, dated 22.10.1992, made in A.S.No.164 of 1992, on the file of the Additional Sub Court, Cuddalore.

2. The brief facts of the case are as follows:

The appellants are defendants in O.S.No.571 of 1984 on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Kallakurichi. The respondent/plaintiff Sowriammal filed a suit against the appellants and the gist of the plaint is that the suit property belongs to one Antony Ammal, w/o.Pitchai Sowri Gounder, that the appellants-defendants are children of Antony Ammal. The said Antony Ammal executed a gift deed in favour of the plaintiff, from then onwards the plaintiff is in possession and enjoyment of the property and is paying kist and taxes for the said property, that during the second week of September, 1984, the defendants attempted to grab the property and therefore the plaintiff filed the above suit for declaration and permanent injunction. After filing of the suit, the defendants forcibly evicted the plaintiff from the suit property and therefore the plaintiff filed an amended plaint for recovery of possession and mandatory injunction.

3. The defendants filed a written s













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top