SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Mad) 835

K.GOVINDARAJAN
V. Natarajan – Appellant
Versus
Saliyur Mahajana Sangam, represented by President, Koorainadu and Post, Mayiladuthurai – Respondent


Advocates:
K.Kannan, for Petitioner.
A.Muthukumar, for Respondent.

ORDER: The above revision petition is filed by the tenant questioning the order of eviction passed by the learned Rent Control Appellate Authority-cum-Sub-Judge, Chidambaram, in the judgment dated 14.11.2003 in R.C.A.No.11 of 2002, confirming the eviction order passed by the learned Rent Controller-cum-District Munsif, Chidambaram, in the order dated 31.7.2002 passed in R.C.O.P.No.3 of 1994.

2. It is not in dispute that the respondent-sangam is the landlord and the petitioner is the tenant. The respondent/landlord filed the petition for eviction of the petitioner-tenant from the premises in question, under Sec.14(1)(B) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, hereinafter called ‘the Act’. The same was contested by the petitioner/tenant stating that the respondent/landlord is a religious and charitable institution and the Rent Control Court cannot entertain the eviction petition and so the petitioner/landlord before the learned Rent Controller has to file a civil suit to evict the petitioner/tenant.

3. The learned Rent Controller found that the respondent/landlord is not a charitable endowment and so it cannot be said that the eviction petition under the provisi



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top